Thursday, December 16, 2010

Still No Job Description for SamTrans Transit Expert


The San Mateo County Board of Supervisors has inexplicably extended the deadline by another 30 days for county residents to apply for the so-called “Transit Expert” seat on the nine-member San Mateo County Transit District Board of Directors.

What is a “Transit Expert”? Who knows? The Transit Expert position has never had any defined criteria associated with it and the appointment has always been at the discretion of the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors.

In fact, the only public acknowledgement of the opening to date is buried on the listing of county commission vacancies deep within the San Mateo County government’s web site. Only someone who was actively tracking this would even know where to look. But worse yet, unlike every other commission vacancy listed on the page, the SamTrans Transit Expert post contains no information, no link to detailed information describing what the position entails, what qualifications one may need or even whom to contact to make such an application. The deadline to apply for the unusually classified Transit Expert seat on the SamTrans board is was Dec. 6, 2010 but it has now been extended by another 30 days.

The SamTrans board oversees a $94-plus million annual operating budget and employees 765 people in the county bus, Caltrain and paratransit services for all of San Mateo County. The position pays approximately $400 a month and board members are eligible for health care benefits. The current Transit Expert, Arthur L. Lloyd, has served in the same capacity for nearly 25 years, or somewhere in the neighborhood of 8 or 9 consecutive terms. Lloyd, 85, is a resident of Portola Valley and is a former Amtrak executive. By virtue of his position on SamTrans, Lloyd also serves as a director of the Peninsula Joint Powers Authority Board which directly oversees Caltrain.

While it is laudable that the Board of Supervisors has extended the filing deadline to hopefully generate greater public interest in applying for the position, the extension has no bearing on the fact that the lack of appropriate criteria and qualifications for the position is simply strange and inconsistent with the requirements of a public office charged with overseeing a great deal of public money and critical services.

This is not the first time the county has been criticized for the oddity of the “Transit Expert” position but there has never been any effort to define criteria. The time has come. The Supervisors need to act on this issue and end this charade.

Let the race begin... Date is set for SMC Supervisors Spring 2011 Election


May 3, 2011 will be the end date for an all-mail election to fill the soon-to-be vacated seat held by San Mateo County Supervisor Mark Church. On Tuesday, Dec. 14, the San Mateo County Supervisors approved the election date according to legal parameters set by State Election Code and the county’s own newly amended charter. The May 3, 2011 date was selected, according to news reports, as that date would allow the county to legally hold an all-mail election which will be far less costly than a traditional election requiring polling places and a great deal of infrastructure. Instead, the critical election will be held by mail only, spreading the election over 30 days from early April. County estimates place the cost for an all-mail election at approximately $1.1 million versus approximately $1.6 million for a traditional election, meaning the county may save as much as $500K by holding an election by mail.

According to the county Elections Office, approximately 43% of the registered voters in the county are permanent absentee voters, and thus vote by mail anyway. In the election held on November 2, 2010, 52% of registered voters requested to vote by mail and approximately 69% of these voters actually voted. For May 3, every registered voter will receive a ballot in the mail, although some could still choose to vote at the County Elections Office on Tower Road and likely some early voting stations such as City Halls in each city. But holding a mail-in Special Election may also impact how candidates campaign and perhaps even give a leg up to one candidate.

This election will likely be decided by older and more established voters. This fact may bode well for candidate Gina Papan whose name among county voters is well known but particularly among those who voted for her father, the late Assemblyman Lou Papan who was in and out of public office for more than 30 years in the county.

Nonetheless, Papan will face a bevy of candidates with their own political assets including San Mateo Union High School District Trustee Dave Pine, San Mateo County Community College Trustee Richard Holober and Burlingame Mayor Terry Nagel. Now that the Supervisorial race has an end date, the pace and fury of the contest will intensify but only after the holidays. Candidates will now have nearly four months to make their respective cases to the voters. The first test for these candidates will be the financial reports due at the end of December and made public in the weeks after that. While there are many tests ahead for these candidates, Papan just scored the first victory by virtue of the type of election that will be held.

Contact Bruce Balshone at bruce.examiner@gmail.com
Visit Bruce Balshone's Examiner Page
Visit Bruce Balshone's Twitter Page
Visit Bruce's Peninsula Examiner Facebook Page